A Large-Scale Food Controversy

The food has gotten larger

The food industry has expanded. To put it plainly. A stroll around the produce section of a grocery store in the 21st century would captivate folks from any other time in history besides our own. It has never been seen before in humanity’s history that tomatoes and lettuce heads have grown to such enormous sizes. This is the sign of a large-scale food controversy.

We have become accustomed to eating food that has been genetically modified because it has only been a few short generations. This new cuisine is tasteless and long-lasting, in contrast to the food available in the past.

Foods that were grown for various reasons could acquire distinctive regional flavors due to variations in the soil and growth conditions. Also, China has procured a large portion of land here in the U.S. taking over American farmlands sneakily.

When food was grown close to where it was sold, the flavor was prioritized over its ability to be transported.

Many people have attributed this decline in food quality to the effects of industrialization and the pressures of efficiency; nevertheless, it is much more accurate to say that it is the result of corruption in government that is the outcome of a socialistic impulse.

They all fall prey to a fundamental human fallacy, which is that “what you see is all there is.” Politicians on both sides of the aisle typically embrace the concept of the United States of America as a free market economy.

via GIPHY

On the other hand, the lobbyists and profitable political action committees that are directly in front of them distort their desire to maintain the cornerstone of the high quality of life in the United States. 

In the moment that a Kansan Sorghum Farmer is sobbing actual tears over your office carpet, the timeless principles of wise governance appear to be trivial and far away.

The farmer desires to maintain the status quo that permeates the thoughts of any politicians who happen to come into contact with him. 

Insignificant particulars, such as the fact that he is representing a corporate farm that is almost completely risk-free and has many middle management employees, become meaningless.

Inevitably, smaller farmers who are unable to employ lobbyists will be the ones to suffer the consequences of this situation. This is because they do not have any means of reminding legislators of their presence leading to a large-scale food controversy.

Prone to error If politicians are more concerned with putting things right through government involvement than they are with honoring liberal ideas, then it is inevitable that they will prefer corporate farmers over both small farmers and the general population of the United States.

The food controversy continues

The incapacity of the government to refrain from taking action has created a negative impact on the fundamental concept of regional cuisine. The government’s support of “American Farmers,” who are firms that are large enough to retain constant spokespeople on staff, only makes this struggle more difficult.

Small family farms already had a difficult time surviving against larger farms that had huge economies of scale. 

To put it another way, even from an interventionist point of view, it would be preferable for firms that are more unstable to receive more help. This would make the free market appear to be superior to the existing scenario, in which the most powerful multi-state farms receive the most substantial subsidies. 

The local history and the growing circumstances came together to produce a food environment that is rich and complex in its many facets.

Because they were able to find a place of value in the palates of the people, the preservation of unique species of plants and animals was a priority. The regional cuisines, which took great pride in their individuality, worked to compensate for the slight inefficiencies that were there. 

On the other hand, certain regions of the United States are better suited to the production of farms that are large enough to qualify for government assistance. The large-scale food controversy perpetuates…

Huge farms in the breadbasket of the United States of America cultivated feelings of compassion for the Great Depression until they entered a trajectory of lobbying and expansion that was impossible to stop. 

They achieved this by having technological superiority, crop homogeneity, and government support, which allowed them to decrease prices to the point that local farms had little chance of competing.

The demise of local farms would be significantly less of an issue if larger farms offered even a semblance of the taste and quality that local farms did. 

Food has become huge and tasteless as a direct result of the government’s sympathy-fueled crusade to preserve a specific subset of farmers. A larger geographic distance from the marketplaces where the product is sold has considerably increased the value of tougher varieties that can ripen long after picking. 

Ripening while still attached to the plant allows more nutrients to enter and enhances the flavor profile. Increased size also improves efficiency because larger fruit is easier to pack and less likely to break. 

While customers would surely prefer more tasty vegetables, government incentives have exacerbated the focus on shelf life and ease of transportation. 

Government-funded GMO research has also exacerbated the problem of an excess of big, flavorless foods. 

GMOs’ long-term health impacts are unknown, but because they directly benefit the wealthiest farmers, regulatory organizations rarely check their use.

via GIPHY

In conclusion

The world could once again respect Americans for their culinary abilities if those in positions of authority were to develop a spine that could withstand the pressure of sob story rent-seeking. 

As the unjust power structures of the agricultural world begin to shift, the quality of life and local farming could progressively increase. 

Healthier and more delectable alternatives may become the standard rather than the costly exception as they are no longer overshadowed by bland produce that is not intended for human consumption. Let me know what you think. 🧐